Warning: strpos() [function.strpos]: needle is not a string or an integer in /nfs/c01/h05/mnt/32378/domains/data-tribe.net/html/wework4her/index.php on line 71
trabajamos para ella !
Wednesday, April 8, 2009, 03:29 AM - Maya.c++.api., Maya.general.modelling, Maya Code library, Research, papers
Posted by Administrator
drl unit trip

Images from collaborative design research paper with Victor Orive


_Prototype of team manifold (c) includes Maria Araya and James Warton.

WIP: branching plug-in for Maya. see previous post

19 comments ( 98 views )   |  0 trackbacks   |  permalink   |   ( 3 / 1117 )

meta-language and notation 
Saturday, March 15, 2008, 07:16 PM - Research, papers
Posted by Administrator
This post is to acknowledge the influence on current work by ideas fostered directly under tutelage, and in association with Vasili Stroumpakos, Theodore Spyropolous, and James Warton. This inflection includes a critical area in design research: that of diagramming information towards the resolution of the 'data-cloud' that holds an architectural solution within.

notation systems: symbols and manipulation;

Marvin Minsky, pioneering extensive research in cognitive science, and evolution of intelligence, explicates that fundamental to the evolution of intelligence and problem solving capacities, is the need for a system of representation:

“All problem-solvers, intelligent or not, are subject to the same ultimate constraints–limitations on space, time, and materials. In order for animals to evolve powerful ways to deal with such constraints, they must have ways to represent the situations they face, and they must have processes for manipulating those representations.”

Marvin Minsky: Communication with Alien Intelligence, Published in Extraterrestrials: Science and Alien Intelligence (Edward Regis, Ed.)Cambridge University Press 1985.

Extending the argument to the domain of ‘design-research’, it could be argued that symbols (notation) and operations (manipulations) are embedded within the ‘performative’ capacities and constraints of the selected tool (s) of design. They produce results, which extend beyond the level of affect and alter the sensibilities of the designer. They manifest themselves as shifts or variations in the organizational relationships and formal possibilities accessible to the designer. Further, symbol systems form an integral aid in ‘procedural thought’ argued for earlier, for any ‘problem-solving’ has to make creative leaps in the face of incomplete information regarding the problem. This because a notational system can be articulated at varying degrees of figural representation as well as describe immaterial substance, and the designer must construct or clarify the components to be examined. The use of notation is not only intended to make recognizable what was potentially unseen, rather to place emphasis on the components or elements of decided significance. In essence then, symbol-systems can aid the process of ‘pattern recognition’ within a ‘search’ for a ‘solution space’. The point here being that, these notations or symbols give data cognitive recognition, which down the path of ‘heuristic learning’ yield unique results based on their the selection . The research has to then clarify and codify its findings and discoveries to fuel its own pursuit further.

images and video relate to aforementioned 'diagramming' in so called non-CAD platforms, including Flash, maxMSP,external hardware and their digital controllers etc.

James warton,AADRL, Manifold-04.06 deomostrating a prototype of software controlled, piston driven 'arms'.

Photograph from FaceBreeder installation by Vasilis Stroumpakos and Theodore Spyropolous at AA School,London. Production Assistants included members from team Manifold, Reploy, YME etc.For more see facebreeeder.com

A software 'map'/feed back loop between Maya, maxMSP, Flash, and external hardware including iCube-X midi-digitiser, pneumatic pistons and solenoid controlled compressor.

a info-map of 26 drl team projects ('03-'05,'04-'06) and their various studies leading to a thesis candidacy proposal.This effort was in collaboration with vasilis stroumpakos.

a info-map of 105 drl team projects as part of the AADRL TEN exhibition. The production team included Kostas Grigoriadis,Peter Sovinc,Suryansh Chandra,Pier Andrea Angius, & Matei denes.
12 comments ( 1031 views )   |  0 trackbacks   |  permalink   |   ( 3 / 1006 )

Data-cloud and Teleology in research. 
Sunday, February 24, 2008, 04:59 PM - Research, papers
Posted by Administrator
“…the reason to make art (and to write) is to understand, rather than because one already understands, (exploration not explication)…”

Brett Staulbaum, Database Logic(s) and Landscape Art ,
accessed December 2004.

The post is part of on-going attempts to collate, evaluate, summate and formalize previous experience, education, and collaborations within the rapidly evolving realm of ‘architectural-computing’. This, in the hope of forging a better understating of current research objectives.

Tracing back current architectural discourse relating to ‘parametrics’ upto the explicit interest in D'Arcy_Thompson’s On growth and Form, John Fraser’s Evolutionary Architecture ,Greg lynn’s animate form, Delanda’s War in the Age of the Intelligent Machine , Marvin Minsky’s Artificial Intelligence, Simon Penny’s The Darwin Machine: Artificial Life and Interactive Art, Patrik Schumacher’s essay Responsive Environments – From Drawing to Scripting, various essays by Lev Manovich including image after the matrix , Craig Reynolds’ ‘Boids’, Cellular Automata, John Conway’s game of life, dynamic, non-linear and chaotic systems, Chuck Hoberman’s transformable designs et al , it would seem that current discourse did pass through a point of diverse interests. Evidently, interests ranged from material computation, artificial intelligence and robotics, kinetic, transformable & deployable architecture, data and information-diagramming & event-driven architecture, ‘emergent’ phenomena, etc. Providing an accessible platform for the exploration of such interests and the development of design, were ‘animation’ software packages and associated ‘scripting’ languages.

The images and videos below trace one example emanating from the nebulous yet potent cloud of discourse as a precursor to a more distilled interest in computational geometry and ‘parametrics’.

sketch (Maya Introduction workshop by Hernan Diaz Alonzo,aadrl 04-06. team included Adam Pollanias, Nuru Karim, Khuzema Hussain.) using Maya particle engine / soft bodies and path-based animation. 'Freezing' at successive time-stops and accruing resultants and remodeling.Generally leading to 'serial' units of form.

manifold:aadrl 04-06

kinetics: NURBS modelling in Rhino. animated in Maya. rigid aggregation of units, working with only translational and rotational degrees of freedom. discrete units in form.

manifold:aadrl 04-06.

manifold:aadrl 04-06.

Procedural animation: Following logically from kinematics studies was an interest in procedural animation.

‘Animation’ could be understood as change of specific parameters or characteristics across time. However, many of the animation ‘tools’ are inherently independent of time or ‘non-linear’. These then control the change of ‘parameters’ through a system of logical relations and numeric attributes. The aim is to appropriate various animation tools / techniques as ‘parametric’ design tools. Associated to this then is, the use of ‘logical’ constraints, controlling one /many attributes with another (driver and driven) , the use of ‘history’ or chain of dependence etc.

machinating ‘control rigs’ where all pre-defined logical relations remain consistent as the system is manipulated or re-evaluated.

4 comments ( 22 views )   |  0 trackbacks   |  permalink   |   ( 3 / 1070 )

legacy and ossification within design processes 
Saturday, February 16, 2008, 10:25 AM - Research, papers
Posted by Administrator
The video and images relate to the design/research project of team Manifold as part of their graduate thesis at AADRL 2004-06;

click for more images and video

click for website

This post coincides with the tenth year anniversary of the AADRL, and the imminent event series including a exhibition,symposium, installation of 'experimental-pavilion' etc.

Of interest to our current work however, is the 'legacy' and ossification of over-arching design/research methodologies initiated and explored over successive periods of 16-month graduate theses projects.

Nested between successive 3 year research agendas, 'responsive environments' and 'parametric urbanism', the one year transitional agenda of 'create-space', provided moments of interest in this very process of negotiation. Investigations within the agenda were held in suspension between the previous agenda of kinetics, morpho-dynamics and algorithmic modeling [AADRL team: emerged](especially within polygon and subDivision geometry formats [AADRL team: noise]), data-driven architecture, localized systems and 'emergence' etc and the next agenda concentrating on and articulating computational geometry, 'parametric' design methods, scale-less networks etc. The agenda was interestingly also transitional in terms of platforms of investigative research, with teams using a myriad of platforms/software such Autodesk Maya, Mcneel rhinoceros, Autodesk 3dmax, Wolfram research Mathematica(AADRL team: y-me), cycling 74 maxMSP, proce55ing, luxology Modo, Adobe Flash, Bentley Generative Components, and associated plug-ins/modules such as syflex Cloth, NextLimit realFlow, 3dmax crowds, Presagis AI implant, Autodesk fluids,cloth,particles, & hair. The agenda also saw interesting confluence in terms of fabrications methods such the use of milling of high-density foam, casting of silicon moulds and fibreglass prototypes, steel milling and detailing, fibrous material and its use as material-computation[AADRL team:anti-fabric] etc.

The projects then, represent an point of inflexion in regard to design, fabrication, & evaluation methods, investigative platforms,and theoretical positions. The research projects are tangibly traceable to precedents, and as imprints in the projects the next agenda.

..post to be expanded into a articulated position on legacy and ossification within design methods.
7 comments ( 98 views )   |  0 trackbacks   |  permalink   |   ( 2.9 / 1149 )

Computation aided /driven 'design process' : research , failure , hueristics , 'versioning', legacy. 
Sunday, February 10, 2008, 07:47 AM - Research, papers
Posted by Administrator
video is a slideshow
A stub post following from previous post:An attempt to collect sketches that were discarded, put on the back-burner etc. To be expanded into an attempt to theorize/collate the processes of failure,accidental discovery & legacy within computation driven 'design' processes.

A free player from tradebit.com

A collection of recent sketches following from a research interest in polygonal geometry: its finite-element data structure, sub-Division schema, innate algorithmic nature of poly-modelling tools, barycentric coordinates and global continuity, 'greebling' and other possibilities for surface articulations, etc.

10 comments ( 53 views )   |  0 trackbacks   |  permalink   |   ( 3 / 1137 )

In Lieu of a Manifesto :Experiments, Hueristics and Praxis 
Wednesday, February 6, 2008, 07:56 PM - Analytical, Research, papers
Posted by Administrator
The following post is abridged from a unpublished research paper that collates personal experiences related to 'architectural-computing' as part of team Manifold,AADRL, Architectural Assistant at HOK Sport London, and as Architectural Assistant at ZHA, London . However a niggling 'computational' task warranted the post. videos are in real time.

Ted Kruger, in his lecture series, Instrument and Instrumentality, uses Herbert Simon’s distinctions between ‘natural’ and ‘artificial’ sciences to describe the ‘sciences’ as operating on two agendas: understanding the world ‘as-is’ and speculating on ‘as-it should be’.

“Herbert Simon writing in Sciences of the Artificial posits two kinds of science the ‘natural’ and the ‘artificial’. Natural sciences, such as physics, chemistry and biology endeavour to understand the world ‘as it is’. The task is fundamentally descriptive and analytical. It concerns itself with thinking. Sciences of the artificial - business, engineering, and all of design, for examples, give primary consideration to the world‘as it should be’….”

Kruger, Ted: Instrument and Instrumentality.
V2_Lab; Workshops, lecture Ted Krueger,<www. lab.v2.nl/events/_docs/lecture_krueger.pdf>, pg 1.

Subscription to and extension of the argument would mean that ‘applied science’ could be posited as the bridge between the two. Further, (architectural) ‘design as research’ could be argued to exhibit similar properties of using, translating, transposing and adapting the descriptive tools of natural science to engineer an imagined and wished world.

_geometric relations, logical structures: parametric systems

Architecture as an assembly of design components implicitly suggests ‘self-similarity’ and ‘difference’ amongst the parts of the system. Particulars or aspects of this similarity and difference could be multitude. Nonetheless, our research aims to ‘appose’ and /or articulate the notion with other issues that deserve to be discussed.

In recent ‘parametric’ systems of design and of codification of design for construction, this aspect of similarity and difference, have tended to be manifested in the production of ‘homeo-morphic’ geometries such as ‘adaptive (to curvature) tiling’ patterns, structural skins etc. Alternatively, there have been systems, like those in robotics , that concentrated on production of non-topological difference and on aspects of ‘family’ and ‘individual’ on the basis of ‘attributes’ such as constituent parts , specific task-capacities, transformation pathways etc. Without explicit allegiance to one or the other, our research gravitates more towards using the first principles of all such systems : that of algorithmic procedures, machinating ‘control rigs’ where all pre-defined logical relations remain consistent as the system is manipulated or re-evaluated, use of external data as strategic inputs, feedback loops etc. Thus, parametric systems can be understood as systems of and/or related to quantification, determination of logical relations and continuous evaluation of a system so ‘rigged’ for multiple design outcomes.

Empirical evidence from (within our current context) of a multi-tiered, plural, and collaborative design process and environment implores for further articulation of one aspect of the definition (in bold above). A possible method of such an articulation, as will be argued in the example below, is through ‘rules-of-thumb’ or an abstraction of information and simplification of the ‘intelligence’ of parametric systems.

A free player from tradebit.com

A free player from tradebit.com

The associated images and video relate to an attempt to ‘parametrisize ’ the effect of built environment on the visual ‘field’ of its context and vice versa. The attempt was to develop a interactive ‘modelling’ tool which would re-evaluate a simple iterative logic upon manipulation of the model: shoot ‘rays’ from every point of a input set of ‘sampling’ points in pre-defined directions, calculate the ratio of the number of rays shot to those intersected by the built mass, and collate the distances at which those intersections occurred. Empirical experience would however point to a computational limit: calculation of intersection of rays with ‘mesh’ geometry, consumes a lot of computational resource and thus slowing down execution times. This, in spite of the code predominantly being wrappers to pre-compiled, professional code (from Autodesk Maya) and accounting for the amateur, enthusiast nature of the attempt. This then, points to significant aspect of ‘parametric’ systems: that of ‘re-evaluation time’ of a ‘parametric’ setup.

A free player from tradebit.com

Elaborating, most ‘parametric’ platforms ((Rhino explicit history, Generative Components, Maya Hyper-graph, Catia object- tree, rendering Shader-networks, et.al)) have to account for, in some form or manner, information flow between constituent ‘nodes’ : black-boxes that take one/multiple inputs and produce an output, which is further connected as ‘input’ to other such ‘nodes’. It then logically, and presumably from postulates of graph theory, follows that ‘evaluation time’ of such a set-up has to be dependent directly on the number of ‘nodes’;

It can be argued further that significant ‘time-gains’ can be effected only through more efficient, professional algorithmic and data structures. In this particular example for instance, there are better and professional (stand-alone) tools available that implement efficient algorithms relating to Geo-spatial analysis. (e.g: Space syntax Isovist, Matlab line of sight et al).

These aspects of ‘parametric’ systems or ‘architectural computing’, coupled with the nature of ‘multi-tiered, plural, and collaborative design process and environment’ outlined previously, point towards a need for ‘rules-of thumb’. Delineating further, these ‘rules’ need to abstract, encapsulate, and allow for the potential to integrate with, more advanced computing logics of science, engineering and construction. This would allow for an informed-yet-fluent design process without placing undue burden on the later stage of integration with ‘computation’ for construction.

Stated differently, most ‘scripting’ and other forms of ‘end-user programming’ within design realms, would be best served as an interface between opening up possibilities in the design realm, and enabling the manifestation of those possibilities in built form.

In the current example, this ‘rule-of-thumb’ was crudely instantiated as a reduction in the number of rays being shot, in order to approximate the result and enable ‘interactive’ feedback…

…More examples and substantiations to the argument to follow.

v1.0 non interactive tool but with shader support

14 comments ( 47 views )   |  0 trackbacks   |  permalink   |   ( 3 / 1183 )

| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |